Resources 
Adapting to the changing demands of users and healthcare enterprises is crucial for healthcare software. A timely UI/UX redesign is more than just a visual update, it enhances efficiency, ensures compliance, and improves user satisfaction – all essential for exceptional patient care.
UI/UX design is like a joke. If you have to explain it, it's not that good. In fact, user assessment of a mobile health app is heavily influenced by its interface design and navigation.
A well-designed user interface isn't just about looking good; it's about understanding and anticipating how users think and act. It zeros in on appearance, responsiveness, effectiveness, and accessibility. Healthcare UI/UX design paves the way for clear decisions, minimises mistakes, and fosters better patient and provider interactions.
Find out more about UI/UX design in healthcare digital solutions in our deep dive, linked here: The Role of UI/UX in Healthcare Technology
However, it's not all smooth sailing. If users are drifting away or there is a sudden influx of support queries, these could be red flags - indicating that the healthcare app’s UI/UX isn't hitting the mark. So, as we dive deeper, let's unpack the warning signs and explore when and why a UI/UX redesign becomes the order of the day.
A UI/UX redesign can breathe new life into healthcare applications. As the digital landscape evolves and user expectations shift, staying updated ensures not only a competitive edge but also enhanced user satisfaction and improved operational efficiencies.
Beyond the surface, a well-thought-out healthcare app redesign can address underlying issues, optimise workflows, and pave the way for smoother interactions. Let’s examine the triggers that could prompt a UI/UX redesign.
Poor user engagement and high bounce rates often indicate that healthcare software needs to be redesigned. Engagement drops when users find an interface confusing or feel it doesn't address their needs. Unfortunately, most software in healthcare is perceived as a nightmare due to poor advocacy for the end user - both for patients and providers.
For example, if bounce rates soar above the average 45%-66% in medical practice websites, it suggests users aren't finding what they want. Rethinking the UI/UX design can boost user engagement in such cases.
When healthcare software has low adoption rates, it usually hints at usability issues or a design that doesn't fit user needs. Users may find it too complex or don't see its value.
User feedback is a goldmine in these situations. By addressing complaints and taking corrective measures, healthcare organisations can significantly improve the usability and adoption of their software.
All Data Health sought to move physicians from traditional paper to e-superbills through a dedicated physician portal, aiming for faster and more accurate claims processing. However, they faced initial pushback. By delving into research to grasp physician requirements, they revamped the medical app's UI. This not only elevated the user experience but also boosted adoption rates and halved the insurance claim processing time.
Overly complex or confusing UI/UX design in digital health solutions can translate to increased support and training needs, burdening resources and lowering efficiency. Simplifying the design can make complex healthcare software less intimidating and more intuitive. This reduces the time and effort required to train staff to support and resolve issues.
When users find the system straightforward to use, the dependence on support resources is reduced, making operations more streamlined and cost-effective.
Good design isn't just about looks; it deeply affects how users feel and think about health apps. Updating outdated visual aesthetics and ensuring software works well on all devices can greatly boost user experience and adoption. We expect to see improved workflows and profit margins when this happens at scale.
“Outdated and unresponsive designs aren't just aesthetic concerns; they hinder progress. Every UI/UX redesign is an opportunity to reimagine, reinvigorate, and re-engage end users, which ultimately affect operations, outcomes and, of course, the bottom line,” says Kumar Gururajan, CTO of Montar.
Did you know that as end-users, doctors spend over 50% of their time with patients using their EHR, indicating a significant workflow inefficiency? We often see this problem with legacy software, which leads to complicated and inefficient workflows in healthcare operations.
With rigid and clunky UI/UX, the solution does not adapt well to the evolving demands, causing workflow bottlenecks and user errors.
Addressing these inefficiencies necessitates a well-thought-out UI/UX redesign. Conducting a clinical workflow analysis to identify incompatibilities between the user interface, user experience, and clinical workflow should be the first step towards enhancing the efficacy of digital health solutions. Rectifying identified issues through strategic redesign can significantly reduce error rates and improve operational efficiency.
Lack of compliance in healthcare software or apps can exclude specific user groups and pose serious legal and ethical risks. Non-compliance with regulations like HIPAA in the US can lead to unauthorised access or misuse of patient health information (PHI), which is unethical and illegal and could result in substantial fines.
Redesigning the UI/UX of healthcare software boosts compliance and aligns with modern standards. During such updates, gap analyses pinpoint non-compliance areas, enabling legacy software to adapt and meet current guidelines.
Accessibility in healthcare apps should ensure inclusivity, no matter their abilities. The design should let users find and understand information quickly, use the app easily, and have the option for multiple languages. It's also important for healthcare apps to address the needs of people with visual, hearing, mobility, or cognitive challenges. Adopting accessibility standards enhances user satisfaction and engagement and promotes healthcare equity, making digital health solutions beneficial for everyone.
In a study of 278 mHealth apps, users often rated the UI/UX 3 or below. Negative feedback about a digital health tech’s UI/ UX can affect user perception and discourage adoption, especially when the solutions fail to deliver on their promises. User satisfaction and adoption increase by continuously updating the software based on feedback.
"Trust is built pixel by pixel. A robust and intuitive UI/UX not only elevates user experience but also paves the way for positive reviews and wider adoption,” says Kumar Gururajan, Tech Head of Montar.
As digital health evolves, regularly revisiting and refining the UI/UX design ensures that solutions remain relevant, user-centric, and compliant with ever-changing standards. Staying ahead of the curve not only benefits providers and patients but also solidifies the software’s reputation in the competitive healthcare landscape.
If you're worried about your medical app UI design not hitting the mark, rest assured it can be improved. Whether you have a pulse on the problem through user reviews or need a thorough audit to pinpoint the issues, our experienced team can help. Once the issues are identified and rectified, a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) can be used to refine the app, ensuring its optimal performance when re-released to the market.
Click here to take the next step to transform your healthcare software.
